- #Waves ssl 4000 mastering rap how to
- #Waves ssl 4000 mastering rap full
- #Waves ssl 4000 mastering rap series
The EQ when increased in the high end doesn't become crazy harsh and digital sounding. No ducking and pumping can be heard, like you do in the Waves version. When compared to the hardware in sound you will notice the UAD version captures a great deal of how the hardware sounds and feel. This can be done by setting the low shelf at around 100hz. For instance in some cases you may want to allow the kick drums low end punch to push through the compressor and not be compressed below 100hz. This allows you to control where the compression is applied in the frequency range. Another excellent feature incorporated into the UAD version is the option to use the filters in dynamic sidechain mode. For the audio comparison we used black knob as this is the only option in the Waves version. This is a feature you will find on the X rack version of the SSL hardware and ensures an accurate emulation between the two. Additional features the UAD version supports that the Waves version does not are the option to switch from black to brown knob for the low end. As a plugin it makes the Waves version look and feel like a kids toy. The UAD version captures everything the hardware has. Making this an accurate comparison between the 3 units.
#Waves ssl 4000 mastering rap series
In this comparison the original E series emulation was used which doesn't include the unison pres. Not only do you get the standard E Series emulation but you also get the updated version which includes unison pre amps emulating the SSL pre amps.
The UAD emulation is something quite spectacular. When you consider for around the same price you can buy the UAD version which we will talk about next. At a price of $249 RRP it's quite frankly a rip off. It just doesn't compare in any way shape or form to what it is trying to emulate.
The highs are harsh when compared to the same settings on the hardware. The compressor sucks and dips in ways only a cheap compressor would.
#Waves ssl 4000 mastering rap full
The black knob which is beautifully warm and full on the hardware is thin and flappy. There is little to no likeness between the Waves version and the hardware. It's a standard channel strip you would receive stock with any DAW with an SSL skin. This is not a SSL E-Series compressor and EQ. Let's just put this out there straight away. When it's looked at in that sense it falls short massively. The fact that it is branded as an SSL 4000 E-Series channel strip it is meant to emulate as close as possible the analogue hardware. As a compressor and EQ channel strip without the name SSL on it, it would be an OK channel strip. If we were to be doing a star rating system this would get 2 stars out of 5 and that's really being generous.
The first emulation in the audio demo is the Waves Audio emulation. It hits the sweet spot of complexity/power as it is.From listening to all 3 versions we have come to the following conclusion. It would be really cool if he had made them true dynamic EQs with the option to boost, as well! But I understand not wanting to make the plugin too complex. I would never have thought of using a deesser as a dynamic EQ, but that's why he has the wide Q option in there, and it's why the frequency range is full range from 20hz to 20khz. I'm just a home studio guy so I don't mean to point out something obvious - I just wanted to mention that in case you hadn't considered using it that way. It really does "suck the boominess" right out! Similar to an EQ cut but since its dynamic the cut is proportional to how much energy is at that band. I default my EQs to 100hz, 1000hz, 3000hz, and 10000hz (sometimes dropped to 6k or 8k) - and I keep that bottom DS2 set to 300 hz with the wide filter so I can use it exactly as Scheps described, and it's great for that. Scheps said (rough quote) "I use the DS2 to suck out the boominess or boxiness" and sure enough - man it's great for that. Eyes & ears together!Ī Scheps video helped me understand how he uses the DS2s: They're versatile, but by default he set up the top one to be a standard deesser and the bottom on to be used more like a dynamic cutting EQ. UI/UX? Function? Results/how it sounds?įor actual deessing I like to use Waves F6 because the UI is so easy to understand, and I do like the visual I get so I can really center in on the frequency and determine how wide my filter should be.
#Waves ssl 4000 mastering rap how to
Given your professional status you obviously know how to use a deesser, so I would be curious to know what about it doesn't work well for you.
0 kommentar(er)
